Result card
|
Authors: Gottfried Endel
Internal reviewers: Wilhelm Donner, Scott Goulden, Grace Jennings, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Ingrid Wilbacher, Claudia Wild
The best possible and most objective information to permit informed decision making or informed consent is needed, not only with regard to the ultrasound test but also, in cases where there is a positive test, about the subsequent pathway of care. Information on the subsequent steps should provide both an overview and in depth information on demand.
The result card A0009 “What aspects of the burden of disease are affected by AAA screening?” presents an overview of outcome measures found in the literature. It was not addressed whether these outcomes were chosen by experts or with patient involvement. This should be clarified.
The general approach on the EU level has to be put into operation at the local level. This could be done using an interactive participatory approach to HTA.
Standard mode of care |
Respect for autonomy |
Organised population screening |
Respect for autonomy |
Standard mode of care |
Non-maleficence: |
Organised population screening |
Non-maleficence: |
Standard mode of care |
Beneficence: |
Organised population screening |
Beneficence: |
Standard mode of care |
Justice: |
Organised population screening |
Justice: |