For each medical intervention informed consent is necessary. The common quality framework for SSGIs shows the responsibilities of a public authority in this context. So the information materials needed for informed consent should be provided by this authority. They should not only cover information on the ultrasound test but also on subsequent management in case of a positive finding. It should thus be possible to reach an informed decision about the test and about the subsequent management. This includes all activities in the field of quality management and evaluation – with a special focus on data use (data protection rights).

• Respect for autonomy: organised population screening does not threaten autonomy. The issuer of the recommendation has the responsibility to inform potential participants as comprehensively and extensively as possible
• Non-maleficence: information should include the following management and aspects of data use
• Beneficence: balancing risks and cost with potential benefits can only be done at the local level (information on cost is local). Organisational aspects are important
• Justice: In this question the domain of justice addresses not only the test procedure but also organisational aspects especially in evaluation