Adapted from the Adaptation Toolkit developed as part of Workpackage 5 of the EUnetHTA 2006-2008 project.
The "speedy sifting" section of the toolkit assesses the relevance of a report (or reports) for adaptation i.e. is the policy and/or research question posed in each report sufficiently similar to warrant adaptation of this/these report/s? Users can assess the relevance of multiple reports on the same health technology and determine which reports are relevant. The aim is that users could make a decision on each HTA report within 2 hours.
The first question posed in the speedy sifting section can result in either proceeding to the following question (with a “yes‟ response) or ending the process (with a “no‟ response). The following five questions (questions 3 to 8) require judgements to be made by the user. Collectively, as a result of responses to these questions, the user must decide whether to end the adaptation process or proceed to the main part of the toolkit (with/without concerns regarding adaptability). The user is questioning whether this report is suitable for their use.
Questions 2 and 4 of the original toolkit have been omitted because they are already answered (since all content in HTA Core Model Online is in English and scoped in detail.)
When deciding whether a report is out of date, consider details such as: the date of literature searches, when data for clinical or economic evaluation was gathered, and whether the technology has changed significantly.
Question | Guidance | Answer |
---|---|---|
1. Are the policy and research questions being addressed relevant to your questions? |
Open the cover page of the collection and select the domains relevant to you for viewing. You can also view just the list of questions without any of the results. |
Yes/No |
3. Is there a description of the health technology being assessed? |
See the result cards in Description and technical characteristics of technology domain. |
Judgement needed |
5. Has the report been externally reviewed? |
This information is not yet available in HTA Core Model Online. |
Judgement needed |
6. Is there any conflict of interest? |
This information is not yet available in HTA Core Model Online. |
Judgement needed |
7. When was the work that underpins this report done? Does this make it out of date for your purposes? |
The work on Abdominal Aorta Aneurysm Screening began on 4.5.2011 and the resulting collection was first published on 31.1.2013. |
Judgement needed |
8. Have the methods of the assessment been described in the HTA report? |
Open the cover page of the collection and select the domains relevant to you and their methodology for viewing. In the collection, see
|
Judgement needed |
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) Programme (project number 05/52/01) and was published in full in Health Technology Assessment 2009; Vol.13: No.59
The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.